Social menu is not set. You need to create menu and assign it to Social Menu on Menu Settings.

September 23, 2021

Aik Designs

——- Creative Solutions ——-

Home » What language to code a mobile application

What language to code a mobile application

5 min read
Mobile App Marketing Ideas

To create it, you have the choice of coding a mobile app or using software. If you choose the former, you should know that there are a multitude of different languages. All of them obey conventions that must be followed to code a mobile application that is both functional and accessible to users. So, which language to choose according to your project? What advantages for which language?


Java is the ideal language for coding a native mobile application for Android. It has the advantage of being used by thousands of developers around the world, sharing their knowledge and feedback. Java compiles the source code used to develop the application into binary code that mobile machines are able to read. Selecting Java to develop a mobile application is a strategic choice. Indeed, it is a language that allows native coding for Android, the most popular operating system, holding more than 80% of the market. While Java is made for Android, it does not mean that other operating systems do. Today, many frameworks exist to run Java via other OS such as Maven Digital Ios app development Services Dubai. To code a mobile app in Java, use Android Studio. It is an online downloadable program that can be run on multiple operating systems.


Kotlin has a lot in common with Java, but is said to be easier to use. It can also be combined with Java. Since June 2019, it has been recognized by Google among the languages to be favored. Since then, Kotlin has continued to grow and conquer new developers through its ease of use. Companies like Interest or Trello have used it.Kotlin also wants to turn to Android. Compatible with all Java libraries, Kotlin is also interoperable with its predecessor. It is quite possible to indicate an Android Java code from Kotlin, and vice versa. The same Android project can also contain both Java and Kotlin files. Finally, Kotlin is very concise code. According to developer feedback, it is faster to intervene on a Kotlin-coded application to debug it. The writing process is also made easier, with Kotlin requiring fewer steps during the actual development. For beginners, this represents less risk of errors and fewer crashes in the long run.


For several years, Google has advocated the use of Java to code a mobile application. More recently still, it is Kotlin which is put forward. These two languages are indeed very robust and reliable compared to the Android operating system. However, it is still possible to use the traditional C language to code an Android mobile application. But you will have to call, occasionally in your code; to other programming languages. The C language itself is very basic. Its later versions C ++ and C # complete its shortcomings. In fact, C is the basis for many programming languages, such as Java. However, if you have limited resources, using C may be a solution. If speed is your number one criteria, C will do just fine. However, you will only be able to develop a limited number of features. This is where it is necessary to use C ++ or C #.

C ++

C ++ allows you to develop native mobile apps for Android. It benefits from official documentation from Google, which can be very useful for beginners: two dedicated kits. The first, called Android SDK, uses Java. NDK Android, the second kit, uses C and C ++. Compared to the SDK, it has the advantage of allowing more power to be extracted from heavy IT tasks. Indeed, it is impossible to fully code a mobile application using C or C ++. If you use these languages, it must be used to integrate heavy features. For the rest, Java, used via Android Studio, meets all the criteria to provide a mobile application that is both functional and ergonomic.


An agile combination of C and C ++, C # is one of the most versatile languages. It is a language that is at the same time simple, flexible, reliable, open source, object-oriented and turned towards Android and iOS at the same time.


It is the programming language launched by Apple in 2014 to develop native mobile applications for iOS. It succeeds Objective-C, which worked with OS X, iOS and their programming interfaces. Swift is today the first language of the iOS environment. It can be complementary to C and C ++. As a native language, it is the preferred language for the development of a mobile app for iOS.


Cordova is not a native language. It allows coding of a so-called hybrid application, which will then be ported to the various operating systems. The advantage of this type of language is that you don’t need to be proficient in native languages of Android or iOS.Cordova is actually an open source mobile development framework. It uses common web languages: HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript to function. Cordova, like other languages, uses APIs to access mobile sensors, data and network status.


Unity is not a language per se, but rather an engine. It is an integrated development environment, on which it is possible to develop mobile games applications. It is a very versatile platform, which offers a functional interface and a large number of features. Although it was originally designed best logo design Auckland for gaming, Unity can of course be used to develop other types of applications. The solution uses the C # language, which may be easier to learn for beginners than Java, for example. But above all, Unity does not require coding all the elements of an application. Many features are already integrated. In short, Unity is an alternative solution if you want to develop your first mobile application, and at the same time start learning C #, a popular language, which could therefore be useful in other projects. To go further, download this e-book on consumer psychology and learn how to create content that interests your audience.

For increase your network security, you can configure a firewall at the IP address 192.168.l.254

0/5 (0 Reviews)